# Climate, Water & Energy Infrastructure

Curated static issue packet for assistant retrieval.

## Links

- App issue page: [Climate, Water & Energy Infrastructure](https://polit.pages.dev/app/?view=issues&issue=energy-climate)
- App idea map: [Climate, Water & Energy Infrastructure ideas](https://polit.pages.dev/app/?view=ideas&issue=energy-climate)
- Machine-readable packet: [energy-climate.json](https://polit.pages.dev/llm/issues/energy-climate.json)
- Issue index: [all curated issues](/llm/issues/index.md)

## Use Rules

- This is a research prototype, not a voter guide, endorsement, or final assessment.
- Many rows are model-generated or unreviewed and should be treated as evidence-navigation aids.
- Missing or limited coverage means the dataset has not ingested, normalized, or balanced that surface yet; it is not evidence that a candidate lacks activity there.
- Use source URLs and record IDs when citing claims. Prefer the linked JSON/JSONL companion files for retrieval.

## Problem Model

Climate, energy, water, wildfire, and infrastructure rows are related delivery problems: California has to decarbonize and adapt while keeping the grid, transportation, insurance, and household costs workable.

### Analysis Questions

- Is the row about emissions goals, energy infrastructure, wildfire/water adaptation, or household affordability?
- Does it name a delivery bottleneck such as grid capacity, timelines, subsidies, permits, or hazard reduction?
- What tradeoff exists between speed, cost, reliability, emissions, and local/environmental review?

## Idea Groups

- **Clean-energy buildout**: 3 approachs; 8 candidates
- **Water and wildfire resilience**: 1 approach; 2 candidates

## Source-Backed Approaches

### Clean-energy expansion

- Approach ID: `energy-climate--clean-energy-transition`
- Summary: Expands clean energy or reduces emissions while managing climate policy.
- Problem: California needs to cut emissions while keeping energy reliable and affordable.
- Mechanism: Expand clean energy, renewable generation, storage, or emissions-reduction programs.
- Candidate stance rows:
  - Antonio Villaraigosa: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; row mix: 1 support row, 1 record-only signal row; confidence `0.8`
  - Betty T. Yee: Supports this approach (`support`); 1 source row; confidence `0.7`
  - Chad Bianco: Supports this approach (`support`); 1 source row; confidence `0.7`
  - Katie Porter: Supports this approach (`support`); 4 source rows; confidence `0.82`
  - Matt Mahan: Mixed / conditional signal (`qualify`); 2 source rows; confidence `0.6`
  - Steve Hilton: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; confidence `0.74`
  - Tom Steyer: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; row mix: 1 support row, 1 mixed / conditional row; confidence `0.66`

### Energy infrastructure buildout

- Approach ID: `energy-climate--energy-infrastructure-buildout`
- Summary: Builds or fast-tracks clean energy, transmission, charging, battery, or grid infrastructure.
- Problem: Clean-energy goals and electrification can fail if the grid, transmission, charging, and storage buildout lags demand.
- Mechanism: Fast-track or build energy infrastructure such as transmission, batteries, charging, geothermal, and grid capacity.
- Candidate stance rows:
  - Antonio Villaraigosa: Mixed / conditional signal (`qualify`); 1 source row; confidence `0.56`
  - Chad Bianco: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; confidence `0.74`
  - Matt Mahan: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; confidence `0.74`
  - Steve Hilton: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; confidence `0.74`
  - Tom Steyer: Supports this approach (`support`); 2 source rows; row mix: 1 support row, 1 mixed / conditional row; confidence `0.74`
  - Xavier Becerra: Supports this approach (`support`); 1 source row; confidence `0.7`

### Water and wildfire resilience investments

- Approach ID: `energy-climate--water-wildfire-resilience`
- Summary: Builds water infrastructure, wildfire prevention, resilience, or natural-resource capacity.
- Problem: Drought, wildfire, and climate risk threaten water reliability, homes, insurance access, and local economies.
- Mechanism: Invest in water infrastructure, forest management, wildfire prevention, defensible space, or resilience capacity.
- Candidate stance rows:
  - Chad Bianco: Supports this approach (`support`); 1 source row; confidence `0.7`
  - Xavier Becerra: Supports this approach (`support`); 1 source row; confidence `0.58`

### Clean-vehicle affordability timeline

- Approach ID: `energy-climate--clean-vehicle-affordability-timeline`
- Summary: Adjusts or supports zero-emission vehicle timelines based on household affordability, adoption progress, vouchers, or subsidies.
- Problem: Clean-vehicle mandates can advance climate goals while creating near-term affordability and access concerns for lower-income households.
- Mechanism: Pace clean-vehicle timelines around adoption progress and affordability, or pair mandates with vouchers and subsidies.
- Candidate stance rows:
  - Katie Porter: Mixed / conditional signal (`qualify`); 1 source row; confidence `0.56`

## Assistant Guidance

- Use this page for curated issue/approach structure only.
- Stance labels refer to the selected approach statement, not the candidate's whole position on the issue.
- `qualify` means a mixed or conditional source signal; it is not a final verdict that the candidate is generally qualified.
- For candidate-specific detail, follow candidate packets and evidence JSONL links.
- If a natural-language question does not match this issue, do not stretch this issue page to answer it.
